Alzheimer's disease
- 5xFAD
- rTg4510
- APP/PS1
- 3×Tg-AD
- P301S (PS19)
- APOE4-Tg
- Aβ42 / ThS pathology burden
- Tau phosphorylation and protein expression
- Glial and inflammatory markers
- Morris water maze, Y-maze and novel-object recognition
LEWOS BIOTECHNOLOGYNEUROSCIENCE · PRECLINICAL CROExplore · Discover · AdvanceCNS EFFICACY
Match models, intervention windows and endpoints to target mechanism and disease stage for preclinical efficacy decisions.
Neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental, psychiatric and injury models differ in pathology and progression. We organize behavior with pathology, molecular and, where needed, electrophysiology evidence so efficacy is not judged from a single readout.
For candidate efficacy validation, dose or route comparison and mechanism studies.
When a candidate moves from in vitro or developability work into in vivo efficacy; when existing results need dose, route or window comparison; or when behavioral, pathology, molecular and electrophysiology evidence must be connected.
01Does the model match the target and disease stage?
02Can behavioral change be supported by tissue or molecular evidence?
03How should dose, route and intervention window be compared?
Choose an experiment combination around the research question. Steps, groups and timing are confirmed per project.
Align target, disease background, age, sex and primary endpoints.
Organize groups, dosing and multi-timepoint phenotype observation.
Combine behavior, tissue, molecular and selected electrophysiology endpoints.
Interpret results against model features and study conditions.
See how models map to endpoints, then open the topic page for model scope and representative evidence.
DELIVERABLES
Deliverables are confirmed against the actual study scope and experiment combination.
Open the topics most directly related to this service for model scope and representative data.
Tell us your candidate type, study goal and development stage. We will help identify the experiment combination for CNS disease models & efficacy.